Skip to content

Fire risk assessment report software

Fire risk assessment report software for teams that lose too much time after the visit.

FRA Flow is the report production system for UK housing FRAs. Move from observations on site to a reviewer-ready BS 9792 report on the same platform, with evidence-linked drafting, an exception queue for the competent person, and branded outputs for landlords.

No card. Two reports a month, free forever.

  • Drafted from structured evidence
  • Reviewer queue built in
  • Branded outputs included

Why post-visit time is where the day actually goes

The site visit is the easy part. Everything after it is where capacity disappears.

01
Most assessors are not slow on the building. They are slow back at the desk reconciling notes, photos, and Word templates from a visit that happened three days ago.
02
Reviewer time scales 1:1 with assessor output unless something changes. The senior reading every paragraph manually is the growth ceiling on the consultancy, and the senior cannot also be on site every week.
03
Branded outputs get rebuilt from scratch per landlord. A consultancy with five housing clients ends up maintaining five Word templates by hand, with formatting drift on every issue.
04
Landlord push-back finds the gaps. When a finding is challenged, the audit trail is a folder of emails, screenshots, and a Word document that has been edited eleven times by three people.

Where report software should reduce friction

Four post-visit problems FRA Flow is built to remove.

01

Drafting from evidence

AI generates narrative paragraphs from your tagged observations, photos, and risk scores. Every line traces back to the source observation that justified it.

02

Review by exception

The reviewer opens an exception queue, not a finished document. They see high-risk findings, AI-drafted paragraphs, and changes since the last review on this building.

03

Per-landlord branding

Branded outputs are configured once per landlord client and applied automatically on every issue. No more maintaining five Word templates by hand.

04

Audit trail by default

Every change recorded, every sign-off attributed, every AI-drafted sentence linked to its evidence. When a landlord challenges a finding, the trail is one click away.

Three things this page does that Word and PDF workflows do not

Built around the reviewer being the bottleneck.

01

Built for the reviewer, not the document

The reviewer is the bottleneck on most consultancies. The software is shaped around removing that bottleneck, not around producing a prettier Word document.

02

Evidence-linked drafting

Every narrative paragraph traces to its source observation. A landlord challenge is answered by clicking a footnote, not by digging through a folder.

03

Per-landlord branding by default

Set up the branded output once per client. Apply on every issue. No copy-pasting headers between Word docs at the end of every job.

From Tuesday evening to Thursday morning

A worked example of the post-visit pipeline.

01

Tuesday evening · Drafting

Back at the desk, the report is already 80 percent drafted from your structured findings. Edit each AI paragraph next to the source observation, edit where judgement requires, queue for review.

02

Wednesday · Review by exception

The reviewer opens the exception queue. High-risk sections, AI-drafted paragraphs, and changes since the last assessment surface first. Sign-off is one action with the audit trail attached.

03

Thursday morning · Issue

Branded PDF and Word outputs go to the landlord. Audit trail attached. Action register populated for close-out tracking on the next review.

How we build

Designed beside experienced UK housing fire risk assessors.

FRA Flow is built in close collaboration with practising fire risk assessors who run UK housing FRAs every week. Every workflow choice, from how observations attach to BS 9792 sections to how the reviewer queue surfaces exceptions, is informed by real housing assessment work, not generic compliance-software thinking.

That collaboration shapes our editorial discipline too. Pages on this site are reviewed by people who have done the work, not by generalist marketers. We do not publish invented metrics, we do not run a "trusted by" logo bar before a customer has shipped a report through the platform, and pre-pilot status is stated where it applies.

01
Pages are dated. Every meaningful page carries an Updated date stamp.
02
Pages are attributed. Every page has a named author byline.
03
Stop-slop discipline. Every push that touches marketing copy goes through an automated scan that blocks AI drama before deploy.
04
BS 9792 references are sourced. Standards content links to BSI, legislation.gov.uk, and our own standards reference.

Plans and pricing

Priced like a report production system.

Reviewer and admin seats are free on every paid tier. Report credits are pooled across the team so one busy assessor does not run out while another has spare capacity. Annual billing saves around 17 percent. See full tiers, including the free tier and Enterprise, on the pricing page.

Solo

Independent assessor

£79 /month

1 assessor included

  • 5 report credits per month
  • Unwatermarked PDFs + AI drafting
  • Action register + 1 free reviewer seat
Most popular

Practice

Small consultancies, 2–10 assessors

£249 /month

+ £49 /month

  • 8 report credits per assessor
  • Unlimited free reviewer + admin seats
  • Client branding profiles + QA workflow

Consultancy

Multi-landlord teams, 10–25 assessors

£499 /month

+ £79 /month

  • 15 report credits per assessor
  • Per-landlord branding + multi-client dashboard
  • Priority support + bulk report packs

Prices shown are monthly. Save around 17% by switching to annual at checkout. See full pricing details for overage rates and feature comparison.

25+ assessors, SSO, or a custom integration?

Enterprise plans start from £1,500 / month and include a named CSM, SLA, and custom domains.

How we compare

Where the report layer fits next to the tools you have used.

If your team currently uses Word templates and a photo folder, FRA Flow replaces the reconciliation work between visit and report. Observations land in structured form on site, photos attach to findings as you record them, and the reviewer sees a clean queue instead of a finished document. See the Word FRA template alternative for the side by side.

If your team uses PocketSurvey, you keep the tablet-first capture you are used to and pick up the report-drafting and reviewer workflow that PocketSurvey leaves to you. The reporting layer is where FRA Flow does most of its work.

If your team uses Riskbase, the change is positioning. Riskbase is form-builder oriented and PAS 79-shaped. FRA Flow is BS 9792-shaped and built around the reviewer being the bottleneck, with the report skeleton and audit trail mirroring the current standard.

FAQ

Questions buyers ask before they commit to a new workflow.

FAQ 01

Can we keep our existing landlord-branded Word template?

Branded output is configurable per landlord client in FRA Flow. We set up your existing template look as the default for that landlord, and the platform produces it on every issue. The work of maintaining the Word template by hand goes away, and the formatting drift between issues goes away with it. Existing reports stay where they are; FRA Flow becomes the system for new assessments and annual reviews going forward, so the migration is operational rather than retrospective.

FAQ 02

How do you handle action close-out tracking?

Each significant finding generates a recommended action with priority, owner, and target close-out timeframe. The action register persists across reviews, so the next annual or post-incident review can see what was closed, what is outstanding, and how long open actions have been overdue. The audit trail records when each action was raised, by whom it was actioned, and when sign-off occurred. Action close-out tracking is in M3 scope and is being built alongside the pilot programme.

FAQ 03

What does the reviewer see that they do not see today?

The reviewer opens an exception queue rather than a finished document. The queue surfaces high-risk findings, AI-drafted paragraphs that have not been edited yet, and changes since the last assessment on the same building. Sign-off is one action with a full audit trail attached. This shifts the reviewer from line-by-line reading to judgement-led review.

FAQ 04

Is AI in fire safety reports a liability risk?

AI in FRA Flow accelerates drafting but never signs off. Every AI-generated paragraph is editable, auditable, and traceable to the photo, observation, or risk score that produced it. The competent person signs off the report, not the AI. The audit trail records who approved which version against which evidence, which strengthens defensibility under the Fire Safety Order 2005 rather than weakening it.

FAQ 05

Where is our customer data stored?

All customer data, including database, file storage, and AI inference, runs in UK or EU regions only. Nothing leaves the European Economic Area. Full security and data-handling details are on the security page.

FAQ 06

What does pricing actually cost a small consultancy?

A 5-assessor Practice team is £249 base plus 5 × £49 = £494 per month on monthly billing, or roughly £394 per month on annual. That includes 40 pooled report credits per month, free reviewer and admin seats, and per-landlord branding. Overage is £12 per report. Full breakdown on the pricing page.

Try the report production workflow on your next housing FRA.

Create your account in under a minute. Two reports a month, free forever, no card. Or book a 30-minute walkthrough to see drafting, reviewer queue, and branded output end to end.